Environmental Regulations’ Impact on Recycling and Environmental Causes
Humans have wide range of effects on the physical environment, including overpopulation, pollution, the use of fossil fuels, and deforestation. These types of changes have resulted in climate change, soil erosion, poor air quality, and undrinkable water. These negative consequences can influence human behaviour, resulting in mass migrations or battles over clean water. However, humans are endowed with conscience, which can assist them in bettering their surroundings. Regulations are basic rules or concrete actions imposed by administrative agencies that either directly or indirectly interfere with the mechanism by manipulating consumer and environment to make it sustainable. Natural resources are overutilized as a result of negative externalities, and environmental problems worsen.
Recycling has been a key component of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) decades-long plans to integrate the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as well as its ongoing efforts to advance a Sustainable Materials Management (SMM) approach, which intends to reduce the environmental impacts of materials throughout their lifecycle. The EPA’s SMM programme provides data, information, guidelines, tools, and technical assistance on issues relating to resource conservation, recycling, resource recovery, waste reduction, and landfilling.
Recycling also saves resources and helps to protect the environment. Reduced waste sent to landfills and combustion facilities; conservation of natural resources such as timber, water, and minerals; and pollution prevention by reducing the need to collect new raw materials are just a few of the environmental advantages. Economic and community benefits include increased economic security through the use of a domestic source of materials, support for the country, and job creation in the recycling and manufacturing industries.
It has been well known that paper production has a significant environmental impact. The use and reprocessing have a number of negative environmental consequences. Paper made from recycled fibers uses less energy, conserves natural resources such as wood, and reduces environmental pollution. The controversy between economic optimization and environmental protection has attracted a lot of attention in recent waste management system planning research programs. This has also resulted in an unprecedented set of waste management goals in the planning of reverse logistics systems. Pati et al. (2008) proposed a mixed integer goal programming (MIGP) model that captures the interdependence of the paper recycling network system. The use of this model can benefit the environment indirectly while also improving the quality of waste paper that reaches the recycling unit.
The 2020 REI Report includes new data on the number of recycling jobs, wages, and tax revenue. According to the report, recycling and reusing materials generate jobs as well as local and state tax revenue. In the United States in 2012, recycling and reuse take into account people for:
- 681,000 jobs
- $37.8 billion in wages; and
- $5.5 billion in tax revenues
For every 1,000 tonnes of materials recycled, this translates to 1.17 jobs. Construction and demolition (C&D) and non-ferrous metals such as aluminium are the industries that provide the most to all three categories (jobs, wages, and tax income).
The most effective and sustainable use and reuse of resources over their entire life cycle SMM evaluates social, environmental, and economic variables on a larger scale, each of which plays a significant role, in order to gain a more holistic view of the entire system. Conserving resources, decreasing waste, delaying climate change, and minimising the environmental implications of the materials we use are all advantages of maximising this relationship and environmental regulations would pave paths to a wealthy country and healthy planet.
If you like this article, you may also like; How Much Money Would A Person Make For Recycling?